Singhski 2025-11-24 05:42 p.m.This is the rational chain of reasoning:
Albert dismissed the action with prejudice -> By law, that bars the same claim or any claim that could have been brought in the same case, i.e res judicata -> NPZ’s argument that the court “retains jurisdiction forever” contradicts this. -> npz seeks to force the court to act through this contract, when it certainly doesn't have to, -> the law can't compel what is impossible, and dismissal with prejudice has made these proceedings an impossibility, -> and while Npz can’t resurrect the old case, he can file a separate civil action to enforce the contract